- Home
- Accident Reconstruction
- Improving Vehicle Accident Reconstruction Results
Improving Vehicle Accident Reconstruction Results
- By Micky Gilbert, P.E.
- Published 03/1/2004
- Accident Reconstruction
- Unrated
Micky Gilbert, P.E.
Micky holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering. Experience, education, and passion for accident reconstruction and analysis, scene examinations, tire imprint analysis, as well as auto racing have earned him an industry reputation as an expert. His background includes vehicle dynamics, mechanical design, accident analysis, handling tests, rollover testing, system development/patent, education, and analysis of auto manufacturer documents and tests. Micky provides national expert services for litigation professionals. Being involved with a number of automotive, and accident reconstruction organizations has enhanced Micky's commitment to the community, as he has become a published writer in several publications. He has been awarded two auto-racing championships. Mickey obtained a United States Patent on an anti-rollover device -The Method and Apparatus for Reducing Vehicle Rollover.
View all articles by Micky Gilbert, P.E.
Automobile accident reconstruction can be simplified by following some specific practices. Good documentation of the physical evidence leads to a thorough understanding of the vehicles' motion before and after an impact. Poor documentation of the evidence may complicate and, in some cases, make a full reconstruction impossible. The accuracy of a reconstruction is largely dependent on the quality and preservation of the physical evidence.
There are three phases to most automobile accidents: pre-collision, collision and post-collision. When investigating an accident, there are distinct physical evidence patterns that should be documented for each phase. Measurement and photographs of the evidence is then used to assess vehicle motion.
Pre-Collision
Vehicles are often at their tire adhesion limit before a collision occurs, whether it be full braking, full yawing (cornering) or a combination of the two. When tires are at their limit, they leave rubber on the road in the form of skid marks and/or yaw marks (see below). Skid marks are straight (the tire is locked up and cannot turn the car). Yaw marks are curved (the car is fishtailing). Most modern vehicles have antilock braking systems, which prevent wheel lock and reduce the likelihood of finding pre-collision skid marks.
![]()
SKID MARKS YAW MARKS
The length and character of this pre-collision evidence usually represents energy loss. In other words, when a vehicle locks its brakes, it loses energy and speed. When a vehicle is fishtailing, it also loses energy, dependent upon its slip angle. In other words, the more sideways it gets, the more energy it loses. Published coefficient of friction values on different surfaces help investigators understand the energy loss.
Collision
When a vehicle collides with an object or another vehicle, it deforms. The exact amount of this deformation also represents energy loss. Collision damage can often be compared to crash test data, in which the energy loss is a known quantity. For example, if a car crushes 20 inches during a frontal collision and that same model crushes 20 inches in a 30 mph barrier impact test, then the collision energy loss is equal, even though other dynamics may be different.![]()
Measurement of the crush damage is then compared to an undamaged vehicle. Measurement accuracy and detailed photographs can greatly influence the reconstruction. Some late model vehicles have black boxes onboard that record speed loss, which can be used to confirm crush energy calculations.
Post Collision
After collision, damaged vehicles cause surface gouges/scrapes, drag marks, fluid trails, and debris trails, all of which help investigators understand post-collision motion. The nature of sliding contact with pavement and/or grass and dirt changes the energy loss. The harder a vehicle drags across and scrapes the surface, the more energy it loses. The resulting surface damage and the corresponding vehicle component should be determined.
All three accident phases and their associated energy loses are added up to give the initial vehicle speed (total energy). Careful documentation of each accident phase, combined with the basic laws of physics, will enhance the reconstruction results.
Copyright 2004 Professional Investigative Engineers. All rights reserved.

