<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Professional Investigative Engineers - Articles - ]]></title>
		<link>http://www.callpie.com/articles</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Forensic Engineering Investigations and Construction and Engineering Compliance for Insurance Adjusters, Attorneys, Builders, Risk Managment Professionals, SIU, Homeowners, and Homeowner Associations]]></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.callpie.com/articles]]></copyright>
		<generator>N/A</generator>
		<webMaster>sgoldwag@callpie.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:35:02 CST</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>20</ttl>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Possible Concerns with Aluminum Wiring]]></title>
			<link>http://www.callpie.com/articles/articles/40/1/Possible-Concerns-with-Aluminum-Wiring/Page1.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Aluminum wiring was commonly used from about 1965 until about 1977 as an alternative to copper wiring. Aluminum (Al) was considerably less expensive than copper (Cu); thus, most homes built during this time frame have aluminum wiring. </p>
<p>According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), homes installed with aluminum branch circuits (manufactured before 1972) are 55 times more likely to have one or more connections reach "Fire Hazard Conditions" than a home wired with copper. </p>]]></description>
			<author>no@spam.com (Stephen F. Biagiotti, SR., P.E.)</author>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:00:00 CDT]]></pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.callpie.com/articles/articles/40/1/Possible-Concerns-with-Aluminum-Wiring/Page1.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>